Making Family Violence Civil Claims In BC

The complex landscape of family violence civil claims in British Columbia (BC) necessitates a nuanced understanding of family law and torts. Victims seeking justice and compensation face a multifaceted procedure, including initiating claims, various potential damages, and the challenge of testifying.

While the process may appear challenging, this analysis aims to clarify the complexities and provide vital insights for those walking this path. It prompts one to question the key considerations when making a family violence civil claim in BC.

Key Takeaways

• Family violence can be addressed through tort claims in family law or as stand-alone civil claims in BC.
• Damages awarded in tort claims can provide financial compensation for harm suffered, including emotional trauma and humiliation.
• Depending on the situation, initiating a civil claim involves filing a Notice of Family Claim or a Notice of Civil Claim.
• The process of making tort claims can be complex, costly, and emotionally demanding, with outcomes dependent on the defendant’s assets.

Understanding Family and Tort Law

Traversing the complex maze of family and tort law can be challenging, especially when dealing with the aftermath of family violence. The term ‘tort,’ derived from the Latin word for ‘wrong’ or ‘injustice,’ encompasses a broad spectrum of civil wrongs, including personal injuries, motor vehicle accidents, negligence, and assault. These are breaches of duties owed to others, such as the duty to drive carefully or avoid causing physical harm.

While tort law largely originates from common law, the evolution of societal norms and problems over time has necessitated the establishment of new legal claims. Unlike family law, governed by specific legislation like the Family Law Act and Divorce Act, most tort claims are not legislatively defined. There are exceptions, however, such as ‘statutory torts’ like a violation of privacy defined under the provincial Privacy Act.

Understanding if harm inflicted upon you constitutes a tort can be intricate. Hence, it is paramount to seek legal counsel in order to navigate the complex legal landscape effectively and make sure your rights are protected. Doing so is particularly critical in the context of family violence, where the outcomes bear significant personal and legal implications.

Types of Damages in Tort Claims

When seeking justice in cases of family violence, understanding the various types of damages that can be awarded in tort claims is essential. These damages provide monetary compensation to victims and serve to penalize those who inflict harm.

1. General Damages: These encompass compensation for non-monetary losses, such as pain and suffering, emotional trauma, impaired social relationships, and reduced life enjoyment due to violence.
2. Pecuniary Damages: These cover the measurable financial losses caused by family violence, such as past and future lost wages, rehabilitation costs, and medical expenses.
3. Aggravated Damages: These are awarded in instances where the harm inflicted was particularly humiliating or degrading. They serve to provide additional compensation for the victim’s suffering.
4. Punitive Damages: Unlike the previous types, these are not intended to compensate the victim but to punish the perpetrator and deter similar behaviour in the future. They are only awarded when the combined general and aggravated damages are insufficient to achieve these goals.

Understanding these categories of damages can empower victims of family violence to seek appropriate legal remedy for the harm they have endured.

Common Tort Claims in Family Violence

Having discussed the types of damages available in tort claims, it is equally important to understand the common torts or wrongful acts that are frequently cited in cases of family violence. Key amongst these are the torts of assault and battery, pervasive in family violence claims. In the legal context, ‘assault’ signifies a wrongful threat of harm, while ‘battery’ denotes actual physical harm.

Importantly, these torts encompass sexual assault, and it is remarkable that spouses can indeed sue each other for such offences. Additionally, other torts commonly cited in family violence scenarios include intentional infliction of mental suffering, public disclosure of private facts, and false imprisonment. It is important to remember that tort law uses specialized language, which may differ from layman’s understanding.

Tort law is a dynamic area of law, constantly evolving. For instance, a recent Ontario Court of Appeal ruling, Ahluwalia v. Ahluwalia, clarified that existing torts like battery, assault, and intentional infliction of emotional distress adequately address the harms arising from family violence. Given these nuances, seeking legal advice is strongly advised.

Initiating a Civil Claim

When you commence a civil claim for family violence, you will need to carefully consider several factors, including the nature of the claim, the choice of court, and adherence to critical timelines. It is important to understand these components to navigate the process effectively.

1. Nature of the claim: The claim could be about an incident within a domestic relationship and may include tort claims such as assault and battery. These can be made alongside family law claims or as stand-alone claims in civil proceedings.
2. Choice of court: The court where the claim is filed can have a major impact on the case proceedings. For instance, the Supreme Court of British Columbia allows the filing of a Notice of Family Claim or a Notice of Civil Claim. However, other courts, like the small claims division of the Provincial Court and the Civil Resolution Tribunal, have limitations on the amount of awards they can make.
3. Filing the claim: Filing involves submitting either a Notice of Family Claim for combined family and tort claims or a Notice of Civil Claim for a stand-alone tort claim.
4. Adherence to timelines: Meeting the set limitation period for filing the claim is important. Failure to do so may result in the loss of the opportunity to bring forth the claim.

How Does Being Declared a “Vexatious Litigant” Impact Family Violence Civil Claims in BC?

Being labeled under the vexatious litigant definition in bc can severely limit an individual’s ability to pursue family violence civil claims. Court restrictions may hinder legitimate cases, delaying justice for survivors. This designation ensures judicial resources are preserved but poses challenges for those seeking protection under complex family violence circumstances.

Challenges of Pursuing Tort Claims

Exploring the details of tort claims in cases of family violence presents a unique set of challenges. These challenges can range from financial implications to personal impact on the claimant. Foremost, the financial burden is often considerable. Given the complexity of tort law, legal representation is often necessary, escalating costs.

Further, the claimant must prove the occurrence of the tort, the extent of their injuries, and causation. This often requires expert testimony, particularly when the injuries are primarily psychological, adding another layer of cost.

Recoverability is another challenge. A claimant may invest significant resources only to face a dry judgment, where the defendant lacks the assets to cover awarded damages. A potential solution is to incorporate the tort claim within a family law claim, as damages can be factored into the division of property.

Limitation Periods for Filing

While the financial and personal challenges of pursuing tort claims in family violence cases can be overwhelming, it is also important to take into account the temporal constraints, specifically the limitation periods for filing such claims. A limitation period is basically a deadline by which a claim must be initiated in court.

• For many torts, such as those involving assaults between strangers, a two-year limitation period generally applies. This means the claim must be made within two years of the incident.
• In cases involving assault between individuals in an intimate relationship or where there is a relationship of dependency, there is no prescribed limitation period. This highlights the recognition of the unique complexities and vulnerabilities in such relationships.
• Similarly, there is no limitation period for claims relating to sexual assault, irrespective of the relationship between the parties involved.
• This absence of limitation period also extends to claims relating to assault, battery or misconduct of a sexual nature where the claimant was a minor.

Understanding these limitation periods is important as they directly impact the legal rights and remedies available to the victims of family violence. It underscores the significance of timely action while also acknowledging the intricate dynamics often present in cases of family violence.

Case Examples and Awards

In the domain of family law and torts, the amount of damages awarded in cases of family violence can greatly vary depending on the unique circumstances of each case. For instance, in Schuetze v. Pyper, the wife was awarded $795,000 after a violent incident, with $100,000 being general damages for pain and suffering. In contrast, Olds College v. Huxley, saw a defamation case against a former wife result in $10,000 total damages.

Additionally, T.K.L. v. T.M.P., awarded the step-daughter $93,850 due to several privacy breaches. A.M. v. S.O., saw $20,000 in general damages awarded for a physical assault, while in Bird v. Kohl, a serious assault led to an award of $155,000 in various damages.

These cases underline the broad spectrum of damages that can be awarded in family violence cases, reflecting the unique and often distressing circumstances that victims endure. Hence, it is important to seek legal advice when considering pursuing a civil claim for family violence.

References

1. Ahluwalia v. Ahluwalia, 2023 ONCA 476 (CanLII)
   https://canlii.ca/t/jz277
2. A.M. v. S.O., 2014 BCSC 4 (CanLII)
   https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2014/2014bcsc4/2014bcsc4.html
3. Bird v. Kohl, 2012 BCSC 1424 (CanLII)
   https://canlii.ca/t/fsxwh
4. Olds College v Huxley, 2019 BCSC 2111 (CanLII)
   https://canlii.ca/t/j3tr8
5. Privacy Act, RSC 1985, c P-21
   https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/laws/stat/rsc-1985-c-p-21/latest/rsc-1985-c-p-21.html
6. Schuetze v. Pyper, 2021 BCSC 2209 (CanLII)
   https://canlii.ca/t/jl5wr
7. T.K.L. v. T.M.P., 2016 BCSC 789 (CanLII)
   https://canlii.ca/t/gr5ld

The Legal Review Process by Spectrum Family Law

• Spectrum strives for high-quality, legally verified content.
• Content is meticulously researched and reviewed by our legal writers/proofers (usually local law students).
• Details are sourced from trusted legal sources like the Family Law Act.
• Each article is edited for accuracy, clarity, and relevance.
• If you find any incorrect information or discrepancies in legal facts, we kindly ask that you contact us with a correction to ensure accuracy.