Shared & Sole Decision-Making in BC Child Custody

In BC, child custody decisions fall under either shared or sole decision-making. Parental responsibilities, as defined by Section 40 of the Family Law Act, provide for shared parenting time and decision-making responsibility, giving equal rights to both parents.¹ However, when necessary for the child’s best interest, the court can grant sole decision-making responsibility to one parent—models such as Joyce and Horn guide decision-making in shared arrangements. Disputes can be settled using strategies like mediation, arbitration, or court intervention. Even with sole guardianship, non-custodial parents might have obligations, such as child support payments and supervised visits. For more insights into these responsibilities or arrangements, keep reading!

Key Takeaways

• In BC, shared parental responsibilities, under section 40 of the Family Law Act, ensures equal rights and decision-making responsibilities for both parents.
• Sole Guardianship grants one parent all decision-making powers, based on the child’s best interests and safety.
• Joint Custody Decision Making encourages a collaborative approach, with mediation and arbitration mechanisms for conflict resolution.
• Guardians under BC’s Family Law Act can make agreements on parenting arrangements, responsibilities, and dispute resolution methods.
• Legal guidance is essential in navigating child custody decisions to protect parental rights and ensure the child’s welfare.

Understanding Shared Parental Responsibilities

Shared parental responsibilities, an essential aspect of child custody in British Columbia, entail shared decision-making powers between parents, particularly when they have equal parenting time. This arrangement is typically the default position as per section 40 of the Family Law Act, recognizing both parents as guardians with equal rights and responsibilities.

In the event of disagreements on significant decisions, parents have options ranging from court intervention to mediation or hiring an arbitrator. Two popular models of guardianship in shared parental responsibilities include the Joyce Model and the Horn Model. The former allows the primary caregiver to make final decisions after consultation with the other parent. Conversely, the Horn Model requires mutual agreement for all major decisions.²

Regardless of the model adopted, the BC Family Law Act emphasizes the duty to consult on major decisions. The act provides the option to involve the court in cases of disagreement, to make certain the best interests of the child are always prioritized. This shared parental responsibility framework promotes cooperative planning and mutual decision-making, and enhances family support networks, in an effort to guarantee the child’s welfare.

Sole Guardianship Basics

In contrast to shared parental responsibilities, sole guardianship is a unique arrangement where all decision-making powers for the child rest in the hands of one parent or guardian. This setup becomes necessary when the other parent is incapable or deemed unfit to make decisions that will safeguard the child’s wellbeing. Circumstances leading to this decision can range from cases of violence, alienation, mental illness, or addiction.

Under the British Columbia Family Law Act, the court grants sole guardianship only when it is in the best interests of the child. The primary purpose of this arrangement is to safeguard the child’s safety, health, emotional well-being, and overall development. It is important to note that the non-custodial parent is usually obligated to pay child support, despite not having decision-making power.

In the case of D v D, the court noted that it will rarely be in a child’s best interests to terminate guardianship and make a parent a ‘person with contact.’ First, the court will consider whether a reallocation of parenting responsibilities can eliminate the risk to the best interests of the child that is posed by the guardian. If this approach works, it allows the child to maintain a meaningful relationship with their parent.³

Furthermore, sole guardianship, if one parent does have their guardianship terminated, does not permanently exclude the non-custodial parent from the child’s life. Depending on the circumstances, the court may allow supervised visits or other forms of contact. This conserves the possibility of rebuilding the relationship between the child and the non-custodial parent, if and when it becomes safe and beneficial.

Allocating Parenting Responsibilities

While sole guardianship is a necessary arrangement in certain circumstances, allocating parenting responsibilities is a common practice in situations where both parents are capable and willing to contribute to their child’s upbringing. In British Columbia, parental responsibilities are governed by section 40 of the Family Law Act. This includes decisions regarding a child’s education, healthcare, and religious upbringing.

In cases of shared responsibility, both parents are expected to consult each other on major decisions regarding their child. The Joyce and Horn models of guardianship provide frameworks for decision-making in such situations. Where disagreements arise, parents can resort to mediation, arbitration, or court intervention.

However, the court can also order one guardian to be in charge or give final decision power, known as the ‘final say provision‘. This provision can be challenged if it is contrary to the child’s best interests.

Regardless of the model of guardianship, the primary objective remains supporting the child’s best interests. In any case of dispute or disagreement, it is advisable to seek the help of experienced family lawyers.

Joint Custody Decision-Making

Joint custody, also referred to as a ‘shared parenting agreement’ in British Columbia, necessitates a collaborative approach to decision-making for the child’s welfare. This model is built on the principle of equal participation from both parents in major decisions impacting their child.

The arrangement, however, does not eliminate the potential for disagreements. In a joint custody setting, conflict resolution is of paramount importance and there are several mechanisms in place to facilitate this:

1. Mediation: This involves a neutral third party who helps the parents negotiate and resolve disputes.
2. Arbitration: In this case, an arbitrator makes the final decision after hearing both sides.
3. Parenting Coordinator: This is a professional who helps parents resolve minor disputes and implement their parenting plan.
4. Court Intervention: As a last resort, parents can seek court intervention to resolve major disagreements.

While joint custody promotes equal involvement, it is critical that the child’s best interests remain the central focus. The success of a shared parenting agreement in BC largely depends on parents’ ability to communicate effectively, resolve disagreements amicably, and put the child’s needs above their own.

Role of Collaborative Planning

Emphasizing the importance of teamwork and cooperation, collaborative planning plays a vital role in child custody arrangements, particularly when it comes to decision-making. This involves the active participation of both parents, working together to create a plan that best suits the needs and welfare of their child.

In the context of British Columbia’s child custody laws, collaborative planning may involve methods such as mediation, family group conferencing, and traditional decision-making. These processes actively involve family and community members in child welfare decision-making, thereby creating plans and agreements that adequately protect children and address family needs.

Collaborative planning often helps avoid court involvement, making it a less adversarial and more constructive avenue for decision-making. These processes are voluntary and confidential under the Child, Family and Community Service Act.⁴

Changes in Divorce Act Terms

Importantly, as of March 1, 2021, there have been significant changes in terms used in the federal Divorce Act related to child custody and decision-making. These amendments are aimed at promoting the best interests of the child and reducing potential harm.

The following are some of the key changes:

1. The term ‘custody’ has been replaced with ‘decision-making responsibility’ and ‘parenting time’.
2. ‘Access’ is now referred to as ‘contact’ and ‘parenting time’.
3. The amendments seek to promote cooperative parenting and discourage adversarial terms.
4. The Divorce Act now explicitly includes factors to contemplate when determining the best interests of the child, such as the child’s needs and the ability of parents to communicate effectively.

These changes reflect a shift towards child-focused language, aiming to reduce conflict and focus on the child’s well-being. They also align more closely with British Columbia’s Family Law Act, providing consistency across jurisdictions. It is important for parents to understand these changes and how they impact decision-making and parenting time arrangements. Legal advice is invaluable when learning how to navigate these changes effectively.

Advice on Decision-Making Responsibility

Traversing the complexities of decision-making responsibility in child custody matters requires a deep understanding of the legal framework and the best interests of the child. Decision-making responsibility, defined under the federal Divorce Act and British Columbia’s Family Law Act, involves making essential decisions about a child’s upbringing.

There are three main arrangements: sole, shared, and split decision-making. Sole responsibility grants one parent the right to make all major decisions, often with the other parent providing child support. Shared responsibility, in contrast, gives both parents an equal say, fostering a cooperative environment for the child’s best interests. Split responsibility allows parents to divide decision-making by child or by issue, offsetting child support payments.

Under British Columbia’s Family Law Act, guardians can make agreements about parenting arrangements, including the allocation of responsibilities, parenting time, and dispute resolution methods. These agreements should be made in writing and can be filed with the court. It’s vital for parents to seek legal advice to navigate these complexities and guarantee the child’s best interests are met.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Are Some Common Factors a Court Considers When Determining Shared or Sole Decision-Making in Child Custody Cases?

When determining shared or sole decision-making in child custody cases, courts typically consider factors such as the child’s needs and preferences, the parents’ ability to communicate, the child’s safety, and their overall well-being.

How Can a Parent Change an Existing Decision-Making Arrangement in a Child Custody Case?

To modify an existing decision-making arrangement in a child custody case, a parent must petition the court, demonstrating a significant change in circumstances and that the adjustment is in the child’s best interest.

Are There Any Support Groups or Resources for Parents Navigating Shared or Sole Decision-Making in Child Custody Cases?

Yes, numerous resources and support groups exist for parents managing shared or sole decision-making in child custody cases. These include local community centres, online forums, legal aid services, and family counselling centres.

How Does Shared or Sole Decision-Making in Child Custody Cases Affect the Child’s Emotional and Psychological Wellbeing?

The child’s emotional and psychological well-being can be greatly impacted by shared or sole decision-making in custody cases. Stability, consistency, and the quality of parental relationships are key factors influencing a child’s overall well-being.

How Does the Court Enforce Shared or Sole Decision-Making Arrangements in Child Custody Cases?

The court enforces shared or sole decision-making arrangements in child custody cases by issuing legally binding orders. Non-compliance may result in penalties, including modification of custody, supervised visitation, or even jail time, in severe cases.

Conclusion

To summarize, shared or sole decision-making determinations in child custody matters in British Columbia require thoughtful consideration to guarantee a child’s best interests are being upheld.

Through understanding the ideas behind shared parental responsibilities, sole guardianship fundamentals, and collaborative planning, parents can effectively navigate these intricate issues.

The Joyce and Horn models, along with the Family Law Act, provide necessary frameworks. Changes in Divorce Act terms further shed light on these custody matters, guiding decision-making and promoting the child’s well-being.

References

1. Family Law Act, SBC 2011, c 25, s 40
   https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/00_11025_00_multi ↩︎
2. LSBC Joyce and Horn Model
   https://learnlsbc.ca/sites/default/files/LSBC_PRC_Family_Appendix_D_Joyce-and-Horn-Model_0.pdf ↩︎
3. D v D, 2013 BCPC 135 (CanLII)
   https://canlii.ca/t/fz3fl ↩︎
4. Child, Family and Community Service Act, RSBC 1996, c 46
   https://canlii.ca/t/566l8 ↩︎

The Legal Review Process by Spectrum Family Law

• Spectrum strives for high-quality, legally verified content.
• Content is meticulously researched and reviewed by our legal writers/proofers (usually local law students).
• Details are sourced from trusted legal sources like the Family Law Act.
• Each article is edited for accuracy, clarity, and relevance.
• If you find any incorrect information or discrepancies in legal facts, we kindly ask that you contact us with a correction to ensure accuracy.